Q. A plan has set the default in the absence of a distribution election to commence payments 90 days after separation from service. It also provides for a one-time election to postpone the payment, but not accelerate it. The language specifically states it is permitted with the “approval of the plan administrator.” Why might the administrator would not approve it?
A. Denial usually is made if the employer already has a distributable event, and then they try to postpone the distribution. It's all about timing!
Recent Comments
Does the roth requirement for catch-up contributions for people who earned $145,000 apply to 457...
Hi Ed,
I really liked this article and I think you make a lot of sense. And I had no...
I believe there's a misstatement in that last quote - it should refer to governmental and...
Working with several medical providers as clients, I note that the high-end earners tend to push...
Congratulations to NTSAA for landing a good one. Nathan's breadth of experience and...