Susan D. Diehl
On Jan. 29, 2016, the IRS released Notice 2016-16 which provides new guidance on what can and cannot be amended in a safe harbor 401(k) or 403(b) mid-year. It is effective for mid-year amendments made on or after Jan. 29, 2016.
The notice includes guidance for traditional safe harbor plans and qualified automatic contribution arrangements (QACAs). The new rule eliminates much of the uncertainty which has overshadowed this popular plan design for years. Over the years many financial organizations, TPAs and trade associations (including the American Retirement Association) have submitted comments to the IRS requesting some relaxing of the rules. This guidance provides that. As a matter of fact it permits mid-year amendments with very few exceptions.
What Is a Mid-Year Amendment?
A mid-year amendment is:
Before this notice the only mid-year amendments that were permitted were the following:
In general, the notice permits almost all “mid-year changes,” defined as a change that is either:
For example changes may be made to the following items that will also require a new notice to participants:
The notice provides that a few mid-year changes are not permitted:
IRS has asked for comments and whether additional guidance is necessary in this area. They specifically are requesting comments on mid-year changes that involve a merger or acquisition, and plans that currently have an eligible automatic contribution arrangement (EACA) for auto enrollment.
On Jan. 29, 2016, the IRS released Notice 2016-16 which provides new guidance on what can and cannot be amended in a safe harbor 401(k) or 403(b) mid-year. It is effective for mid-year amendments made on or after Jan. 29, 2016.
The notice includes guidance for traditional safe harbor plans and qualified automatic contribution arrangements (QACAs). The new rule eliminates much of the uncertainty which has overshadowed this popular plan design for years. Over the years many financial organizations, TPAs and trade associations (including the American Retirement Association) have submitted comments to the IRS requesting some relaxing of the rules. This guidance provides that. As a matter of fact it permits mid-year amendments with very few exceptions.
What Is a Mid-Year Amendment?
A mid-year amendment is:
- a change that is effective during a plan year and not the beginning of the plan year; or
- a change that is effective as of the beginning of the plan year, but adopted after the beginning of the plan year
Before this notice the only mid-year amendments that were permitted were the following:
- mid-year adoption of a new safe harbor plan;
- amending to add a Roth deferral option, including IRRs (In-Plan-Roth Rollovers);
- amending the plan to conform with the definition of spouse and the Windsor decision;
- adoption of a short plan year or a mid-year change in the plan; year
- mid-year reduction or suspension of safe harbor contributions (exiting);
- mid-year plan termination; or
- use of the maybe notice to change to safe harbor status.
In general, the notice permits almost all “mid-year changes,” defined as a change that is either:
- effective on a day other that the first day of a plan year, or
- a change effective on the first day of a plan year but adopted after the beginning of the year.
For example changes may be made to the following items that will also require a new notice to participants:
- plan amendments to add a distribution option,
- changes to contact information which the regulations require to be part of the safe harbor notice, and
- changes to default investments, which the regulations require to be part of a QACA notice.
The notice provides that a few mid-year changes are not permitted:
- a change from a traditional safe harbor to a QACA, or vice versa; however the addition of an automatic enrollment feature to a traditional safe harbor plan is permitted;
- an amendment that would violate the anti-cutback rule;
- a change to the vesting schedule that increases the number of years for 100% vesting for QACA safe harbor contributions; or
- a change reducing the number or otherwise narrowing group of employees eligible to receive safe harbor contributions. However, this does not limit the ability of the employer to amend a plan mid-year to change eligibility requirements for employees who have not yet become eligible to receive safe harbor contributions.
IRS has asked for comments and whether additional guidance is necessary in this area. They specifically are requesting comments on mid-year changes that involve a merger or acquisition, and plans that currently have an eligible automatic contribution arrangement (EACA) for auto enrollment.
Susan D. Diehl, CPC, QPA, ERPA, is President, PenServ Plan Services; Chair, NTSA Communications Committee.
Opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of NTSA, or its members.
Recent Comments
Does the roth requirement for catch-up contributions for people who earned $145,000 apply to 457...
Hi Ed,
I really liked this article and I think you make a lot of sense. And I had no...
I believe there's a misstatement in that last quote - it should refer to governmental and...
Working with several medical providers as clients, I note that the high-end earners tend to push...
Congratulations to NTSAA for landing a good one. Nathan's breadth of experience and...