Q. I am working with a public school superintendent to include retirement benefits in his individual contract. In looking at the contract wording the district plans to use, I see that they have given the superintendent a choice of medical insurance OR an employer contribution to the 403(b) plan. I seem to recall there could be a problem with this one.
A. A choice between a non-taxable benefit (the medical insurance) and a non-elective contribution to the 403(b) plan (deferred compensation) would cause the health insurance benefit to be taxable under the constructive receipt doctrine. There is an additional risk of inadvertently creating a Code Section 125 plan in which employer contributions to a 403(b) plan are not permissible. They should not permit the superintendent to have a choice between those two benefits.
Recent Comments
Does the roth requirement for catch-up contributions for people who earned $145,000 apply to 457...
Hi Ed,
I really liked this article and I think you make a lot of sense. And I had no...
I believe there's a misstatement in that last quote - it should refer to governmental and...
Working with several medical providers as clients, I note that the high-end earners tend to push...
Congratulations to NTSAA for landing a good one. Nathan's breadth of experience and...